Australia’s Additive Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre (AMCRC) works with 70 industry partners to deliver collaborative R&D projects. They also work on workforce development and technology transfer. It’s kind of analogous to America Makes, but with a broader focus than just defense. AMCRC is funded to the tune of $57 million by the Australian government and is trying to help additive manufacturing grow and gain a foothold in the country.
Now the AMCRC is working with Austal and Curtin University on a $600,000 research product. Austal is an Australian shipbuilder that employs over 4,000 people and has revenues of 1.82 billion Australian dollars ($1.29 billion in US). Austal has built patrol vessels for many countries and also builds ferries, submarines, and autonomous vessels. Curtin, meanwhile, is a leading university for mining, geology, geophysics, and architecture.
The research project will look through Austal’s defense supply chain to identify parts ripe for 3D printing. Running for 18 months, the idea is to develop “a practical, industry-ready framework capable of providing consistent methodology for assessing potentially thousands of components against operational, commercial, technical, and regulatory requirements.” This is similar to the US Army, Navy, and America Makes projects that we’ve seen in the US.
This seems like a sensible move for Austal. This way, the company can reap the benefits from AM while learning to deploy it more widely. The partners also want to look to “support sovereign manufacturing capability.” Australia is very far from anywhere else and indeed extremely far away from the US. In the case of a long, drawn-out conflict or a very impactful one, Australia will have to make many parts itself. In Europe, these sovereign manufacturing exercises always have an air of tea, biscuits, and let’s run the flag up the pole. For Australia, on the other hand, this is a very serious thing indeed. Especially for large parts such as steam turbine components or superstructures, Australia would need to be able to repair them quickly and on its own if it were cut off from the US or if the part was too large for even the US’s enormous C5 aircraft. Generally, having a repair ability would also be very useful in the event of a conflict. And speaking up lead times for casting and forging is always a good idea. 3D printing and sustainment are generally a match made in heaven.
Head of Research and Development at Austal, Sam Abbott, noted that,
“The challenge is no longer whether additive manufacturing works. The challenge is knowing where it delivers the greatest value. This framework will help us quantify the demand for additive manufacturing across maritime and defence programs, allowing industry to make better investment decisions, build more resilient supply chains and accelerate the uplift of Australia’s advanced manufacturing capabilities.”
Austal is
Australia’s Additive Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre (AMCRC) works with 70 industry partners to deliver collaborative R&D projects. They also work on workforce development and technology transfer. It’s kind of analogous to America Makes, but with a broader focus than just defense. AMCRC is funded to the tune of $57 million by the Australian government and is trying to help additive manufacturing grow and gain a foothold in the country.
Now the AMCRC is working with Austal and Curtin University on a $600,000 research product. Austal is an Australian shipbuilder that employs over 4,000 people and has revenues of 1.82 billion Australian dollars ($1.29 billion in US). Austal has built patrol vessels for many countries and also builds ferries, submarines, and autonomous vessels. Curtin, meanwhile, is a leading university for mining, geology, geophysics, and architecture.
The research project will look through Austal’s defense supply chain to identify parts ripe for 3D printing. Running for 18 months, the idea is to develop “a practical, industry-ready framework capable of providing consistent methodology for assessing potentially thousands of components against operational, commercial, technical, and regulatory requirements.” This is similar to the US Army, Navy, and America Makes projects that we’ve seen in the US.
This seems like a sensible move for Austal. This way, the company can reap the benefits from AM while learning to deploy it more widely. The partners also want to look to “support sovereign manufacturing capability.” Australia is very far from anywhere else and indeed extremely far away from the US. In the case of a long, drawn-out conflict or a very impactful one, Australia will have to make many parts itself. In Europe, these sovereign manufacturing exercises always have an air of tea, biscuits, and let’s run the flag up the pole. For Australia, on the other hand, this is a very serious thing indeed. Especially for large parts such as steam turbine components or superstructures, Australia would need to be able to repair them quickly and on its own if it were cut off from the US or if the part was too large for even the US’s enormous C5 aircraft. Generally, having a repair ability would also be very useful in the event of a conflict. And speaking up lead times for casting and forging is always a good idea. 3D printing and sustainment are generally a match made in heaven.
Head of Research and Development at Austal, Sam Abbott, noted that,
“The challenge is no longer whether additive manufacturing works. The challenge is knowing where it delivers the greatest value. This framework will help us quantify the demand for additive manufacturing across maritime and defence programs, allowing industry to make better investment decisions, build more resilient supply chains and accelerate the uplift of Australia’s advanced manufacturing capabilities.”
Austal is